References

Houston WJB, 2nd edn. Oxford: Wright; 1993
Mills JRE, McCulloch KJ Treatment effects of the twin block appliance. A cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114:15-24
Tulloch JF, Proffit WR, Phillips C Influences on outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111:533-542
Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111:391-400
Baccetti T, McGill JS, Franchi L, McNamara JA, Tollaro I Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusions with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113:333-343
Mandall N, DiBiase A, Littlewood S Is early Class III protraction facemask treatment effective? A multicentre, randomised, controlled trial: 15 month follow-up. J Orthod. 2010; 37:149-161
Ireland AJ, Songra G, Clover M, Atack NE, Sherriff M, Sandy JR Effect of gender and Frankfort mandibular plane angle on orthodontic space closure: a randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2016; 19:74-82
Flores-Mir C, Nebbe B, Major PW Use of skeletal maturation based on hand-wrist radiographic analysis as a predictor of facial growth: a systematic review. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:118-124
Hunter WS, Baumrind S, Popovich F, Jorgensen G Forecasting the timing of peak mandibular growth in males by using skeletal age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007; 131:327-333
Silveira AM, Fishman LS, Subtelny JD, Kassebaum DK Facial growth during adolescence in early, average and late maturers. Angle Orthod. 1992; 62:185-190
Araujo MTS, Cury-Saramago AA, Motta AFJ Clinical and radiographic guidelines to predict pubertal growth spurt. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011; 16:98-103
Fishman LS Maturational patterns and prediction during adolescence. Angle Orthod. 1987; 57:178-193
Spier L The growth of boys: dentition and stature. Am Anthropol. 1918; 20:37-48
Demirjian A, Goldstein H, Tanner JM A new system of dental age assessment. Human Biol. 1973; 45:211-227
Scammon RE The measurement of the body in childhood.Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1930
Tanner JMCambridge: Cambridge University Press;
Tanner JM Growth and maturation during adolescence. Nutr Revs. 1981; 39:43-55
: RCPCH; 2006
Freeman JV, Cole TJ, Chinn S, Jones PRM, White EM, Preece MA Cross sectional stature and weight reference curves for the UK, 1990. Arch Dis Child. 1995; 73:17-24
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, 1965. I. Arch Dis Child. 1966; 41:(219)454-471
Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH Clinical longitudinal standards for height, weight, height velocity, weight velocity, and stages of puberty. Arch Dis Child. 1976; 51:170-179
Sullivan PG Prediction of the pubertal growth spurt by measurement of standing height. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5:189-197
Mellion ZJ, Behrents RG, Johnston LE The pattern of facial growth and its relationship to various common indexes of maturation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143:845-854
Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O, 2nd edn. Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics; 2004
Marshall WA, Tanner JM Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Arch Dis Child. 1969; 44:(235)291-303
Marshall WA, Tanner JM Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Arch Dis Child. 1970; 45:(239)13-23
Singh G, 2nd edn. New Delhi, India: Jaypee Bros; 2007
Gruelich WW, Pyle SI Radiographic atlas and skeletal development of the hand and wrist.Palo Alto, Calif, USA: Stanford University Press; 1959
Singer J Physiologic timing of orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 1980; 50:322-333
Fishman LS Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturity. Angle Orthod. 1982; 52:88-112
Chapman SM Ossification of the adductor sesamoid and the adolescent growth spurt. Angle Orthod. 1972; 42:236-244
Houston WJB The current status of facial growth prediction: a review. Br J Orthod. 1979; 6:11-17
Isaacson K, Thom AR, Horner K, Whaites E, 3rd edn. London: BOS Publication; 2008
Hassel B, Farman AG Skeletal maturation evaluation using cervical vertebrae. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 107:58-66
Bacetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) method for the sssessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Sem Orthod. 2005; 11:119-129
Nestman TS, Marshall SD, Qian F, Holton N, Franciscus RG, Southard TE Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011; 140:182-188
Krogman WMAnn Arbor, Michigan, USA: The University of Michigan Press; 1972
Eveleth PB, Tanner JM, 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1990
Bishara SEPhiladelphia, Penn: WB Saunders;

Assessment of growth in orthodontics

From Volume 10, Issue 1, January 2017 | Pages 16-23

Authors

Goldie Songra

BDS, DDS, MFDS, MOrth, FDS(Orth) RCSEng

Consultant Orthodontist, Kidderminster Hospital and Worcestershire Royal Hospital

Articles by Goldie Songra

Tarun K Mittal

BDS

Specialty Registrar, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth

Articles by Tarun K Mittal

Julie C Williams

BDS, MFGDP, DPDS MA (Ethics of Healthcare)

StR in Orthodontics, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton and Yeovil District Hospital and University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

Articles by Julie C Williams

Jonathan R Sandy

PhD, MSc, BDS, FDS MOrth, FMedSci

Professor in Orthodontics, Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol

Articles by Jonathan R Sandy

Abstract

Being able to predict the likely timing and duration of growth accurately, in particular the pubertal growth spurt, is important in orthodontic treatment planning. The different assessments of growth, their advantages and disadvantages will be described.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: A knowledge of the typical assessments of skeletal growth is important in the planning and execution of orthodontic treatment.

Article

Growth can be defined as an increase in cellular size and number and can be linked with development, including an increase in specialization or function.1 It is certainly an important factor in orthodontics as it can both directly and indirectly influence treatment. The obvious direct effect is potential growth modification in both Class 22,3,4 and Class 3 skeletal cases.5,6 Similarly, growth can have a direct and sometimes adverse effect on the occlusion and therefore delay treatment. For example, a Class III skeletal pattern may become more severe, as might an anterior open bite. In such cases, treatment may have to be put on hold until growth has essentially ceased. The presence or absence of growth may also have a less obvious and more indirect effect on orthodontic treatment. For example, overbite reduction is often easier in the growing child and, more recently, it has been reported that the rate of active tooth movement is likely to be greater at times of rapid growth, particularly around the time of the pubertal growth spurt.7

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available