References

Brezniak N, Wasserstein A Orthodontically induced inflammatory root resorption. Part I: The basic science aspects. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72:(2)175-179
Kaley J, Phillips C Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice. Angle Orthod. 1991; 61:(2)125-132
Brin I, Tulloch JF, Koroluk L, Philips C External apical root resorption in Class II malocclusion: a retrospective review of 1-versus 2-phase treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:(2)151-156
Brudvik P, Rygh P Root resorption beneath the main hyalinized zone. Eur J Orthod. 1994; 16:(4)249-263
Chan E, Darendeliler MA Physical properties of root cementum: part 7. Extent of root resorption under areas of compression and tension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:(4)504-510
Han G, Huang S, Von den Hoff JW, Zeng X, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Root resorption after orthodontic intrusion and extrusion: an intraindividual study. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:(6)912-918
Harris DA, Jones AS, Darendeliler MA Physical properties of root cementum: part 8. Volumetric analysis of root resorption craters after application of controlled intrusive light and heavy orthodontic forces: a microcomputed tomography scan study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 130:(5)639-647
Jimenez-Pellegrin C, Arana-Chavez VE Root resorption in human mandibular first premolars after rotation as detected by scanning electron microscopy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:(2)178-184
Parker RJ, Harris EF Directions of orthodontic tooth movements associated with external apical root resorption of the maxillary central incisor. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114:(6)677-683
Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part II. Treatment factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119:(5)511-515
Owman-Moll P, Kurol J, Lundgren D Continuous versus interrupted continuous orthodontic force related to early tooth movement and root resorption. Angle Orthod. 1995; 65:(6)395-401
Weiland F Constant versus dissipating forces in orthodontics: the effect on initial tooth movement and root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2003; 25:(4)335-342
Miura F, Mogi M, Ohura Y, Hamanaka H The super-elastic property of the Japanese NiTi alloy wire for use in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1986; 90:(1)1-10
Mandall N, Lowe C, Worthington H, Sandler J, Derwent S, Abdi-Oskouei M Which orthodontic archwire sequence? A randomized clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2006; 28:(6)561-566
Mavragani M, Vergari A, Selliseth NJ, Boe OE, Wisth PL A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with a standard edgewise and a straight-wire edgewise technique. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22:(6)665-674
Scott P, DiBiase AT, Sherriff M, Cobourne MT Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:(4)470-e8
Pandis N, Nasika M, Polychronopoulou A, Eliades T External apical root resorption in patients treated with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 134:(5)646-651
Fritz U, Diedrich P, Wiechmann D Apical root resorption after lingual orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop. 2003; 64:(6)434-442
Brezniak N, Wasserstein A Root resorption following treatment with aligners. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78:(6)1119-1124
Barbagallo LJ, Jones AS, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA Physical properties of root cementum: Part 10. Comparison of the effects of invisible removable thermoplastic appliances with light and heavy orthodontic forces on premolar cementum. A microcomputed-tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008; 133:(2)218-227
Smith NJ Orthodontic radiology: a review. Int Dent J. 1987; 37:(1)16-24
McNicol A, Stirrups DR Radiation dose during the dental radiographic techniques most frequently used during orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 1985; 7:(3)163-171
Ferguson JW, Evans RI, Cheng LH Diagnostic accuracy and observer performance in the diagnosis of abnormalities in the anterior maxilla: a comparison of panoramic with intraoral radiography. Br Dent J. 1992; 173:(8)265-271
Leach HA, Ireland AJ, Whaites EJ Radiographic diagnosis of root resorption in relation to orthodontics. Br Dent J. 2001; 190:(1)16-22
Årtun J, Van't Hullenaar R, Doppel D, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Identification of orthodontic patients at risk of severe apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:(4)448-455
da Silveira HL, Silveira HE, Liedke GS, Lermen CA, Dos Santos RB, de Figueiredo JA Diagnostic ability of computed tomography to evaluate external root resorption in vitro. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2007; 36:(7)393-396
Dudic A, Giannopoulou C, Leuzinger M, Kiliaridis S Detection of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment by using panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography of super-high resolution. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 135:(4)434-437
Remington DN, Joondeph DR, Årtun J, Riedel RA, Chapko MK Long-term evaluation of root resorption occurring during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96:(1)43-46
Levander E, Malmgren O Long-term follow-up of maxillary incisors with severe apical root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22:(1)85-92
Kalkwarf KL, Krejci RF, Pao YC Effect of apical root resorption on periodontal support. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 56:(3)317-319
Levander E, Malmgren O, Eliasson S Evaluation of root resorption in relation to two orthodontic treatment regimes. A clinical experimental study. Eur J Orthod. 1994; 16:(3)223-228
George A, Evans CA Detection of root resorption using dentin and bone markers. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009; 12:(3)229-235
Putranto R, Oba Y, Kaneko K, Shioyasono A, Moriyama K Effects of bisphosphonates on root resorption and cytokine expression during experimental tooth movement in rats. Orthodontic Waves. 2008; 67:141-149
Talic NF, Evans C, Zaki AM Inhibition of orthodontically induced root resorption with echistatin, an RGD-containing peptide. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:(2)252-260
El-Bialy T, El-Shamy I, Graber TM Repair of orthodontically induced root resorption by ultrasound in humans. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:(2)186-193
Årtun J, Smale I, Behbehani F, Doppel D, Van't Hof M, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM Apical root resorption six and 12 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75:(6)919-926

Orthodontics and root resorption part 2

From Volume 4, Issue 1, January 2011 | Pages 18-22

Authors

Farnaz Parvizi

MPhil, BDS, FDS RCS(Eng), MOrth RCS(Ed)

Senior Registrar (FTTA) in Orthodontics, Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital

Articles by Farnaz Parvizi

Christopher S Barker

BChD, MFDS RCS(Ed)

Specialist Registrar in Orthodontics

Articles by Christopher S Barker

Frank Weiland

DMD, PhD

Specialist Practitioner in Orthodontics, Department of Orthodontics, University Dental School, Vienna, Austria

Articles by Frank Weiland

Jonathan R Sandy

PhD, MSc, BDS, FDS MOrth, FMedSci

Professor in Orthodontics, Department of Child Dental Health, Bristol Dental Hospital, Bristol

Articles by Jonathan R Sandy

Abstract

The aim of this second article in this series of two is to outline the treatment-related factors, which are understood to play an important role in orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR). This article will highlight the importance of patient assessment, as well as the long-term effects of OIIRR. It will also discuss future developments, which may improve our understanding of the mechanisms of tooth movement and root resorption.

Clinical Relevance: The orthodontic practitioner should be aware of the iatrogenic effects of treatment mechanics and the need for detailed patient assessment prior to the start of treatment to reduce harmful consequences.

Article

Orthodontically-induced inflammatory root resorption (OIIRR) occurs when orthodontic forces are applied to the dentition (Figure 1). This results in the induction of a local periodontal inflammatory process. This inflammation, which is essential for tooth movement, is the fundamental component of the root resorption process and causes remodelling of both cementum and dentine of the roots.1 During periods of relative quiescence, the cementum undergoes repair such that, for most teeth in most patients, the changes in root length are so small as to be difficult to detect and are often clinically insignificant.2 Different treatment modalities have been implicated in the development of OIIRR and the extent to which this affects the dentition.

Although there is not a large body of evidence linking the length of treatment to an increased risk of root resorption, Brin et al3 examined the effect of 2-phase vs 1-phase treatment of Class II cases on root resorption. They suggested that those children who underwent a 2-phase treatment, using a Bionator functional appliance followed by fixed appliances, had the fewest incisors with moderate to severe OIIRR. They also demonstrated that, as treatment time increased, so did the odds of OIIRR. The odds of a tooth experiencing severe root resorption were greater with a large reduction in overjet during phase 2.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available