References

McNamara JA, Brudon WLAnn Arbor: Needham Press Inc; 1995
Cetlin NM, Ten Hoeve A Nonextraction treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1983; 17:396-413
Laing E, Ashley P, Naini FB, Gill DS Space maintenance. Int J Ped Dent. 2009; 19:155-162
Martins RP, Magno AF, Martins IP, Martins LP, White LW Composite pontics for orthodontic patients with extraction spaces. World J Orthod. 2010; 11:180-184
Cope JB, Samchukov ML, 4th edn. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL Mosby: St Louis; 2009
Block MS, Cervini D, Chang A, Gottsegen GB Anterior maxillary advancement using tooth–supported distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 53:561-565

Tricks of the trade: Modified transpalatal arch for space maintenance in post distraction cases

From Volume 10, Issue 3, July 2017 | Pages 116-117

Authors

Tanuja Ajit Deshpande

MDS

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad 580 009, Karnataka, India

Articles by Tanuja Ajit Deshpande

Roopak D Naik

BDS, MDS

Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, SDM College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Sattur, Dharwad – 580 009 Karnataka, India

Articles by Roopak D Naik

Harshavardhan Kidiyoor

BDS, MDS

Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics

Articles by Harshavardhan Kidiyoor

Anand K Patil

BDS, MDS, MOrth RCS(Edinb)

Professor and Head, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, SDM College of Dental Sciences, Sattur, Dharwad, Karnataka 580009, India

Articles by Anand K Patil

Article

Proper maintenance and utilization of space is an important criterion in orthodontics, especially in cases where space has been created by atypical methods. Here an innovative transpalatal arch has been suggested to maintain space created by anterio-posterior distraction. This method serves as an aesthetic pontic and, during subsequent space closure, the acrylic pontic attached to the transpalatal arch can be sequentially trimmed.

A space maintainer is an intra-oral appliance used to maintain arch length subsequent to premature loss or extraction of primary or permanent tooth/teeth until the space is utilized for the desired purpose. In the mixed dentition, the space created by loss of deciduous teeth needs to be maintained till the eruption of their successors. In the permanent dentition, the space may be utilized for desired tooth movement. Achieving the desired post orthodontic tooth positions is difficult if such space is lost.

Various space maintainers have been used for orthodontic purposes.1,2 The most commonly used ones include, the transpalatal arch (TPA), the nance palatal arch and the lingual arch. The transpalatal arch and nance palatal arch can be used in both mixed and permanent dentitions, but they do not control the vertical movement of the opposing dentition in asymmetrical extraction cases. In addition to this, the acrylic button of the nance palatal arch may cause tissue irritation. Both appliances do not control the distal movement of the anteriors in any extraction space.3

Most orthodontic patients are worried about the visibility of extraction spaces during the course of the treatment. Many alternative solutions have been suggested to the use of temporary aesthetic composite pontics and riding acrylic pontics.4 Both these have limited application in the prevention of the eruption of an opposing tooth into the extraction space. The chances of repeated breakage of aesthetic composite pontics and the questionable stability of riding pontics is a cause for concern.

Space maintainers can be removable or fixed, unilateral or bilateral and can be specific to a particular arch.3 Unilateral fixed appliance space maintainers are used in the mixed dentition. They are simple to fabricate and can be used bilaterally, but they do not control the supra-eruption of opposing teeth. Their placement does not permit simultaneous space closure. The removable appliance depends on the patient's compliance.

The present design modification of the transpalatal arch is proposed in order to:

  • Reinforce anchorage;
  • Aid in mastication;
  • Permit simultaneous space closure;
  • Prevent supra-eruption of the antagonist tooth;
  • Improve aesthetics in anterior extraction spaces;
  • Lessen soft-tissue irritation;
  • Make it easy to fabricate.
  • In the present case (Figures 15), anterior maxillary distraction was performed and the appliance was removed after a consolidation period of 3 months. The maintenance of the space gained for its appropriate utilization for orthodontic alignment and prosthetic replacement is important in such cases.5,6 The gained space after the distraction was maintained with the help of the modified transpalatal arch.

    Figure 1. Intra-oral views showing pre-distraction stage.
    Figure 2. Intra-oral views showing post-distraction stage.
    Figure 3. Intra-oral occlusal view showing pre-distraction stage.
    Figure 4. Intra-oral occlusal view showing post-distraction stage.
    Figure 5. Intra-oral occlusal view showing placement of modified TPA in post-distraction space.

    The design of the transpalatal arch was modified to work as a space maintainer as follows:

  • TPA was fabricated from 0.036” stainless steel wire (LeoWire, Leone SpA, Firenze, Italy; www.leone.it (Figure 6).
  • The free ends, after making the double-back, were adapted on to the edentulous space and an acrylic molar was attached with cold cure clear acrylic (Figures 7, 8). This served as a space maintainer as well as improving the masticatory ability of the patient. The mesial surfaces of the prosthetic molars can be trimmed and the anteriors can be retracted in the available space.
  • Figure 6. Study model with modified TPA framework.
    Figure 7. Study model with placement of acrylic teeth on to the TPA wire framework.
    Figure 8. Lateral view of the study model with placement of arcylic teeth on to the TPA wire framework.

    The proposed design of the TPA therefore serves as a prosthetic replacement for the patient and as a space maintainer for the orthodontist. This design can also be applied in atypical molar extraction cases in order to preserve anchorage and maintain space for retraction, can be modified to act as a bite block, and can also serve as an aesthetic pontic to mask the premolar extraction space in orthodontic patients.