References

De Boer M Sucking of thumb or fingers. Neth Dent J. 1976; 83:22-69
Larsson E Dummy- and finger-sucking habits with special attention to their significance for facial growth and occlusion. 1. Incidence study. Swed Dent J. 1971; 64:667-672
Larsson E The prevalence and aetiology of prolonged dummy and finger sucking habits. Eur J Orthod. 1985; 7:172-176
Patel A Digit sucking in children resident in Kettering (UK). J Orthod. 2008; 35:255-261
Mills JR The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Br J Orthod. 1991; 18:267-275
Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 104:153-161
Courtney M, Harkness M, Herbison P Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 109:616-624
Webster T, Harkness M, Herbison P Associations between changes in selected facial dimensions and the outcome of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110:46-53
Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111:391-400
Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 113::40-50
O'Brien KD, Wright J, Conboy F Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:234-243
Andresen V, Haϋpl KBerlin: Meusser; 1936
Chadwick SM, Banks P, Wright JL The use of myofunctional appliances in the UK: a survey of British orthodontists. Dent Update. 1998; 25:302-308
Herbst E Dreissigjtige Erfahrungen mit dem Retentions – Schamier. Zahn Ztl Rundschau. 1934; 43:1515-1524
Pancherz H The effect of continuous bite jumping on the dentofacial complex: a follow-up study after Herbst appliance treatment of Class II malocclusions. Eur J Orthod. 1981; 3:49-60
Pancherz H The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod. 1982; 82:104-113
Pancherz H Vertical dentofacial changes during Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation. Swed Dent J. 1982; 15:189-196
Pancherz H The Herbst appliance – its biological effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod. 1985; 87:1-20
O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 124:128-137
Pancherz H, Hägg U Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88:273-287
Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118:159-170
Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, De Toffol L, McNamara JA Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129:599.e1-599.e12

Treatment of a class II malocclusion complicated by digit-sucking

From Volume 10, Issue 3, July 2017 | Pages 112-115

Authors

Peter Woodhead

BTEC National Diploma in Dental Technology, Diploma in Professional Studies (Orthodontics Technology)

Orthodontic Technician, Seacroft Hospital, Leeds, UK

Articles by Peter Woodhead

David O Morris

BDS, MSc(Lond), FDS(Ortho) RCPS, FDS RCS(Eng), MOrth RCS(Eng)

Consultant in Orthodontics, Seacroft Hospital, Leeds, UK

Articles by David O Morris

Abstract

This article describes the management of a 12-year-old girl who presented with a Class II division 1 incisor relationship on a Class II skeletal base with an overjet of 10 mm and a thumb-sucking habit. This patient was treated with a modified Herbst appliance to correct the Class II skeletal pattern and break her thumb-sucking habit.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: It is important to recognize a digit-sucking habit early as this needs to be eliminated prior to starting orthodontic treatment. This can complicate treatment of patients who require treatment with functional appliances.

Article

The prevalence of digit-sucking varies between 12–34% in 9-year-olds.1,2,3 There is little published literature on the prevalence of digit-sucking habits in the UK. A relatively recent study undertaken in Kettering reported that 23.6% of children reported a history of a habit and 12.1% reported a prolonged habit past the age of 7 years old.4

Management of a digit-sucking habit is initially conservative and can include the following:

If intercepted early, the anterior open bite caused by the digit-sucking habit can resolve, but this can take several years. Management of a patient with this particular habit is complicated because, prior to starting any orthodontic treatment, the digit-sucking habit has to have been discontinued because any treatment undertaken without this will relapse.

A Class II malocclusion in a growing individual can be managed by growth modification with functional appliances. Functional appliances can be defined as fixed or removable orthodontic appliances, which use the forces generated by the stretching of muscles, fascia or periodontium to bring about change to the existing skeletal or dental relationship.5 There is strong evidence to suggest that the large amount of correction achieved is dento-alveolar.6,7,8,9,10,11

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available