References

Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol. 1968; 13:61-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(68)90037-x
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 10650. 2018. http://www.iso.org/standard/73302.html (accessed September 2022)
Lee HL, Orlowski JA, Rogers BJ. A comparison of ultraviolet-curing and self-curing polymers in preventive, restorative and orthodontic dentistry. Int Dent J. 1976; 26:134-151
Mills RW, Jandt KD, Ashworth SH. Dental composite depth of cure with halogen and blue light emitting diode technology. Br Dent J. 1999; 186:388-391 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4800120
Elaut J, Wehrbein H. The effects of argon laser curing of a resin adhesive on bracket retention and enamel decalcification: a prospective clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2004; 26:553-560 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/26.5.553
Cobb DS, Dederich DN, Gardner TV. In vitro temperature change at the dentin/pulpal interface by using conventional visible light versus argon laser. Lasers Surg Med. 2000; 26:386-397 https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9101(2000)26:4<386::aid-lsm7>3.0.co;2-c
Mills RW, Uhl A, Jandt KD. Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J. 2002; 193:459-463 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801597
Shortall AC, Price RB, MacKenzie L, Burke FJ. Guidelines for the selection, use, and maintenance of LED light-curing units - Part 1. Br Dent J. 2016; 221:453-460 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.772
Bishara SE, Ajlouni R, Oonsombat C. Evaluation of a new curing light on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2003; 73:431-435
Lamper T, Steinhäuser-Andresen S, Huth KC Does a reduction of polymerization time and bonding steps affect the bond strength of brackets?. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16:665-671 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0540-0
Cerveira GP, Berthold TB, Souto AA Degree of conversion and hardness of an orthodontic resin cured with a light-emitting diode and a quartz-tungsten-halogen light. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32:83-86 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp048
Fleming PS, Eliades T, Katsaros C, Pandis N. Curing lights for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013; 143:S92-103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.07.018
Tavas MA, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1979; 6:207-208 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.6.4.207
Cheng L, Ferguson JW, Jones P, Wilson HJ. An investigation of the polymerization of orthodontic adhesives by the transillumination of tooth tissue. Br J Orthod. 1989; 16:183-188 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.16.3.183
King L, Smith RT, Wendt SL, Behrents RG. Bond strengths of lingual orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured composite resins cured by transillumination. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987; 91:312-315 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90172-7
Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC. Bracket bond strength with transillumination of a light-activated orthodontic adhesive. Angle Orthod. 2001; 71:307-311 https://doi.org/10.1043/0003-3219(2001)0712.0.CO;2
Watts DC. Let there be more light!. Dent Mater. 2015; 31:315-316 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.001
Ward JD, Wolf BJ, Leite LP, Zhou J. Clinical effect of reducing curing times with high-intensity LED lights. Angle Orthod. 2015; 85:1064-1069 https://doi.org/10.2319/080714-556.1
Malkoç S, Uysal T, Uşümez S In-vitro assessment of temperature rise in the pulp during orthodontic bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010; 137:379-383 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.02.028
Nitta K. Effect of light guide tip diameter of LED-light curing unit on polymerization of light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2005; 21:217-223 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.03.008
Hodson NA, Dunne SM, Pankhurst CL. The effect of infection-control barriers on the light intensity of light-cure units and depth of cure of composite. Prim Dent Care. 2005; 12:61-67 https://doi.org/10.1308/1355761053695149
Soares CJ, Braga SSL, Ribeiro MTH, Price RB. Effect of infection control barriers on the light output from a multi-peak light curing unit. J Dent. 2020; 103 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2020.103503
Shimokawa CA, Harlow JE, Turbino ML, Price RB. Ability of four dental radiometers to measure the light output from nine curing lights. J Dent. 2016; 54:48-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.010

An overview of light-curing within orthodontics

From Volume 16, Issue 1, January 2023 | Pages 28-31

Authors

Liam Monaghan

BDS, MFDS RCS Ed, MOrth RCS Eng

StR Orthodontics, University Dental Hospital, Manchester

Articles by Liam Monaghan

Email Liam Monaghan

Richard Needham

BDS, MFDS RCS Ed, MJDF RCS Eng, MSc (Pros), MSc (Ortho), MOrth RCS Eng, FDS Orth RCS Eng

Consultant Orthodontist, University Dental Hospital Manchester

Articles by Richard Needham

Abstract

The use of light to initiate bonding reactions has become an integral part of orthodontic practice. Different technologies are available to cure dental composite, each with advantages and drawbacks. The efficacy of light-curing is affected by a range of factors and it is important for orthodontists to understand these concepts, alongside common problems with light-cure units, to aid in troubleshooting. Periodic testing of light-curing equipment can help to identify defective units that can potentially contribute to bond failure.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: An understanding basic materials science in relation to dental light-curing technology is important in allowing orthodontists to maintain safe and effective equipment. The choice of light-curing equipment and method of use can influence bond strength and, therefore, treatment success.

Article

Historically, fixed orthodontic appliances were retained through circumferential bands chemically bonded to enamel with a luting cement. In the 1960s, enamel conditioning with acid was shown to facilitate effective micromechanical bonding with resin composite,1 which has since become the most widely used method of retaining orthodontic appliances. Devices which exploit light to initiate such bonding reactions have become a key piece of equipment in any orthodontic clinic. Dental light-curing units (or more precisely: ‘powered polymerization activators’2) have evolved from the early use of UV light to a wide range of units, using a variety of light sources to produce visible light. Such developments have resulted in safer, more efficient curing that orthodontists have come to rely on daily.

The importance of light-curing in relation to the clinical effectiveness of bracket bonding is often overlooked in favour of other important factors, such as the bonding material, bracket surface structure and the technique sensitivity of the bonding process. It is important for clinicians to have a working knowledge of different types of light-curing unit, in addition to the light-curing process itself, because this allows dentists to identify potential problems that may lead to an increased bond failure rate.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available