References

What is critical appraisal?. 2009.
Greenhalgh T, 3rd edn. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006
O'Brien KD, Wright JL, Mandall NA How to do a randomized controlled trial. J Orthod. 2003; 30:(4)337-341
Sutherland SE Papers about therapy. Evidence-based dentistry. Part V. J Can Dent Assoc. 2001; 67:(8)442-445
An investigation of minimisation criteria. 2006.

Useful concepts for critical appraisal: 1. study design

From Volume 5, Issue 2, April 2012 | Pages 57-60

Authors

Archna Suchak

BSc(Hons), BDS(Hons), MFDS, MSc, MOrth RCS, FOrth RCS

Locum Consultant Orthodontist, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London

Articles by Archna Suchak

Ama Johal

BDS, PhD, FDS(Orth) RCS

Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Growth and Development, Bart's and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Institute of Dentistry, Queen Mary's College, London, UK

Articles by Ama Johal

Angie Wade

BSc, MSc, PhD, CStat ILTM

Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics, Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK

Articles by Angie Wade

Abstract

There is an increasing volume of research undertaken within orthodontics and with this comes a need to evaluate what is available. This short series of three articles aims to help the orthodontist revise basic concepts of critical appraisal and pertinent statistics.

Clinical Relevance: Critical appraisal skills are valuable tools that can aid clinical decision-making. In this first of three articles, we discuss different study designs.

Article

Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically examining research to judge its trustworthiness, and its value and relevance in a particular context.1 Critical appraisal skills can be applied to almost any published research study. There are many resources available to assist with critical appraisal including a variety of checklists. However, for a checklist to be effective, one has to have a good understanding of the points to be considered. Therefore, an understanding of the research process, the rationale, strengths and weaknesses of different study designs and statistical and clinical inference are all essential to enable the reader to appraise effectively.

Scientific research usually involves undertaking a methodological study in order to answer a specific question. The introduction of a study should ideally summarize the literature, highlighting any shortcomings and clearly defining the questions that the study is intending to answer (its aims). These may include a hypothesis that will be tested, such as whether a treatment is effective (Box 1).

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available