References

Levander E, Malmgren O. Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: a study of upper incisors. Eur J Orthod. 1988; 10:(1)30-38
Linge BO, Linge L. Apical root resorption in upper anterior teeth. Eur J Orthod. 1983; 5:(3)173-183
Kurol J, Owman-Moll P. Hyalinization and root resorption during early orthodontic tooth movement in adolescents. Angle Orthod. 1998; 68:(2)161-165
Estrela C, Bueno MR, De Alencar AH, Mattar R, Valladares Neto J, Azevedo BC Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2009; 35:(11)1491-1497
Lund H, Grondahl K, Hansen K, Grondahl HG. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. A prospective study using cone beam CT. Angle Orthod. 2012; 82:(3)480-487
Brudvik P, Rygh P. Root resorption beneath the main hyalinized zone. Eur J Orthod. 1994; 16:(4)249-263
Ngan DC, Kharbanda OP, Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. The genetic contribution to orthodontic root resorption: a retrospective twin study. Aust Orthod J. 2004; 20:(1)1-9
Al-Qawasmi RA, Hartsfield JK, Everett ET, Flury L, Liu L, Foroud TM Genetic predisposition to external apical root resorption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003; 123:(3)242-252
Brezniak N, Wasserstein A. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part 2. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993; 103:(2)138-146
Newman WG. Possible etiologic factors in external root resorption. Am J Orthod. 1975; 67:(5)522-539
Remington DN, Joondeph DR, Artun J, Riedel RA, Chapko MK. Long-term evaluation of root resorption occurring during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989; 96:(1)43-46
Kindelan SA, Day PF, Kindelan JD, Spencer JR, Duggal MS. Dental trauma: an overview of its influence on the management of orthodontic treatment. Part 1. J Orthod. 35:(2)68-78

Root resorption during fixed appliance therapy – mechanism, risk factors and prognosis

From Volume 9, Issue 3, July 2016 | Pages 96-99

Authors

Triona Fahey

BDS(Hons), MFDS(Lond), MScD(Cardiff), MOrth RCSEd

StR in Orthodontics, Cardiff Dental Hospital, UK

Articles by Triona Fahey

Pamela Stephenson

BDS, MSc(Lond), PhD(Otago), FDS, DOrth, MOrth RCS(Eng)

Consultant in Orthodontics, Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, Wales, UK

Articles by Pamela Stephenson

Abstract

This article examines the prevalence, mechanism and risk factors associated with orthodontically induced root resorption. The long term prognosis for those who suffer severe root resorption is also discussed.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: Root resorption is an inevitable consequence of treatment with fixed appliances. This article indicates risk factors which may be identified prior to treatment, and measures which may be taken to minimize shortening during treatment.

Article

External inflammatory root resorption is an inevitable iatrogenic effect of orthodontic treatment. It results in root shortening, and occurs to some extent in all patients treated with fixed appliances. For the majority of patients the shortening is minimal (< 2 mm) and causes no long term clinical problems. However, for a small percentage of patients the resorption is more severe and generalized, and has implications for the long term health and longevity of the dentition (Figure 1). The variation in the severity of resorption cannot be accounted for by different forces or mechanics used alone. There appears to be a susceptibility to resorption amongst certain patients. Recent research has focused on identifying risk factors, so patients in the higher risk categories may be made aware of this as part of the informed consent process prior to treatment.

The prevalence reported in the literature varies widely. Resorption is a 3-D phenomenon, which is difficult to quantify accurately using traditional radiographic methods. Root shortening of over 2 mm has been reported in 10–18% of patients1,2 by studies using OPT investigations. A study using histological techniques reported much higher figures of 93% of teeth showing signs of resorption following orthodontic force application for 4 weeks.3 Cone beam computed tomography has been demonstrated to be more sensitive in diagnosing resorption lesions4 and, using this technique, Lund et al reported root shortening of at least 1 mm in 94% of patients.5 In the majority of patients, resorption of less than 2 mm will be clinically insignificant, and may be accepted as an inevitable result of orthodontic treatment. Shortening of over 4 mm has been reported in approximately 6% of patients,5 and it is this cohort of patients who may have long term detrimental effects.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available