References

Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets versus conventional stainless steel twin brackets with second-order angulation in the dry and wet (saliva) states. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 2001; 120:361-370
Henao SP, Kusy RP. Evaluation of the frictional resistance of conventional and self-ligating bracket designs using standardized archwires and dental typodonts. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:202-211
Shivapuja PK, Berger J. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthoped. 1994; 106:472-480
Rossouw EP. Friction: an overview. Semin Orthod. 2003; 9:218-222
Kusy RP. Ongoing innovations in biomechanics and materials for the new millennium. Angle Orthod. 2000; 70:366-376
Forsberg CM, Brattström V, Malmberg E, Nord CE. Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. Eur J Orthod. 1991; 13:416-420
McLaughlin RP, Bennett JC. The transition from standard edgewise to preadjusted appliance systems. J Clin Orthod. 1989; 23:142-153
Irvine R, Power S, McDonald F. The effectiveness of laceback ligatures: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Orthod. 2004; 31:303-311
Usmani T, O'Brien KD, Worthington HV, Derwent S, Fox D, Harrison S A randomized clinical trial to compare the effectiveness of canine lacebacks with reference to canine tip. J Orthod. 2002; 29:281-286
Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N. The effectiveness of laceback ligatures during initial orthodontic alignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod. 2012;
Halimi A, Benyahia H, Doukkali A, Azeroual MF, Zaoui F. A systematic review of force decay in orthodontic elastomeric power chains. Int Orthod. 2012; 10:223-240
Elhussein MA, Sandler PJ. Effective Derotation of canines and premolars. J Clin Orthod. 2016; 50

Stainless steel ligatures in orthodontic treatment

From Volume 14, Issue 1, January 2021 | Pages 44-47

Authors

Jonathan Sandler

BDS (Hons), MSc, PhD, MOrth RCS, FDS RCPS, BDS(Hons), MSc, PhD, FDSRCPS, MOrth RCS, Consultant Orthodontist, , DOrth RCS

Consultant Orthodontist, Chesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield, UK

Articles by Jonathan Sandler

Email Jonathan Sandler

Abstract

Using stainless steel auxiliary ligatures in conjunction with fixed orthodontic appliances is of paramount importance in many stages of orthodontic treatment. There is a lack of articles in the literature that provides a comprehensive review of the uses of different methods of ligation in orthodontic treatment. The aim of this article is to provide an illustrated review of their use with fixed appliances; moreover, it will provide practical tips for their appropriate use.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: This article aims to provide a review, with detailed illustration, of the use of stainless steel ligatures in orthodontic treatment.

Article

Orthodontic techniques have evolved significantly over the past three decades. The use of stainless steel auxiliary ligatures with fixed orthodontic appliances contributes significantly to the efficiency and the effectiveness of tooth movement, largely due to the so-called frictionless or low-friction mechanics,1,2,3 much more effective engagement of the archwire into the bracket slot and the advantage of being a much less plaque retentivearrangement.4,5

Elastomeric modules are by far the most popular method of ligation of archwires; they are preformed, convenient and allow rapid archwire engagement, yet they have disadvantages: mainly saliva/bacteria absorption causing reduced effectiveness with time, and limited elastic properties that sometimes compromise full archwireengagement.6

The uses of stainless steel ligatures with fixed appliances include the following:

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available