References

Johns Hopkins University. Online Mendelian inheritance in man, OMIM. Number: 164210. 2022. https://tinyurl.com/msarr2mf (accessed June 2022)
Pruzansky S. Not all dwarfed mandibles are alike. Birth Defects. 1969; 1:120-128
Poswillo D. The aetiology and pathogenesis of craniofacial deformity. Development. 1988; 103:207-212
Poswillo D. Otomandibular deformity: pathogenesis as a guide to reconstruction. J Maxillofac Surg. 1974; 2:64-72
Caron CJ, Pluijmers BI, Wolvius EB Craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in craniofacialmicrosomia: A multicenter study of 755 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017; 45:1302-1310
Elsten E, Caron C, Dunaway D Dental anomalies in craniofacial microsomia: a systematic review. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2020; 23:16-26
Birgfeld C, Heike C. Craniofacial microsomia. Semin Plast Surg. 2012; 26:91-104
Poswillo D. The pathogenesis of the first and second branchial arch syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1973; 35:302-328
Taysi K, Marsh J, Wise D. Familial hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate J. 1983; 20:47-53
Werler M, Sheehan J, Hayes C Demographic and reproductive factors associated with hemi-facial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004; 41:494-450
Kaban L, Moses M, Mulliken J. Correction of hemifacial microsomia in the growing child: a follow-up study. Cleft Palate J. 1986; 23:50-52
Steinbacher D, Gougoutas A, Bartlett S. An analysis of mandibular volume in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011; 127:2407-2412
Vento A, LaBrie R, Mulliken J. The O.M.E.N.S. classification of hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1991; 28:68-77
Gougoutas A, Singh D, Low D, Bartlett S. Hemifacial microsomia: clinical features and pictographic representations of the OMENS classification system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007; 120:112-120
Birgfeld C, Heike C, Saltzman B Reliable classification of facial phenotypic variation in craniofacial microsomia: a comparison of physical exam and photographs. Head Face Med. 2016; 12 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-016-0109-x
David D, Mahatumarat C, Cooter R. Hemifacial microsomia: a multisystem classification. Plast Reconstr. 1987; 80:525-535
Martelli-Junior H, Miranda RT, Fernandes CM Goldenhar syndrome: clinical features with orofacial emphasis. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18:646-649
Goldenhar M. Associated malformations of eye and ear, particularly dermoid syndrome epibulbar-appendices, congenital auricular fistulas and its relations with manibulofacial dysostosis. J Genet Hum. 1952; 1:243-282
Grayson B, Boral S, Eisig S Unilateral craniofacial microsomia. Part I. Mandibular analysis. Am J Orthod. 1983; 84:225-230
Sharpen P. Neural crest and tooth morphogenesis. Adv Dent Res. 2001; 15:4-7
Seow W, Urban S, Vafaie N, Shusterman S. Morphometric analysis of the primary and permanent dentitions in hemifacial microsomia: a controlled study. J Dent Res. 1998; 77:27-38
Maruko E, Hayes C, Evans C Hypodontia in hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2001; 38:15-19
Ongkosuwito E, de Gijt P, Wattel E Dental development in hemifacial microsomia. J Dental Res. 2010; 89:1368-1372

Craniofacial Microsomia: Aetiology, Classification and Clinical Features. Part 1

From Volume 15, Issue 3, July 2022 | Pages 143-147

Authors

Clara Gibson

BDentSc, MJDF RCS(Eng), MClin Dent, MOrth RCS(Eng)

Orthodontic Registrar, Department of Orthodontics, Eastman Dental Hospital, 256 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LD, UK

Articles by Clara Gibson

Suhaym Mubeen

BDS, MFDS RCS(Ed), MOrth RCS(Ed)

Specialist Registrar in Orthodontics, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 7XX, UK

Articles by Suhaym Mubeen

Robert Evans

MScD, FDS RCS(Eng), MOrth RCS(Ed)

Consultant Orthodontist, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London

Articles by Robert Evans

Abstract

‘This article gives an overview of craniofacial microsomia (CFM), its diagnostic features and relevant classification systems. Craniofacial microsomia is the most common facial anomaly after cleft lip and palate. It has a wide phenotypic variance and requires a multidisciplinary approach for comprehensive management. We outline both the facial and dental manifestations and orthodontic implications.

CPD/Clinical Relevance: CFM patients often require comprehensive dental and orthodontic care and it is necessary for the clinician to be aware of the clinical challenges in treating this cohort of patients. By having a thorough understanding of the aetiology and clinical features, it can help direct appropriate clinical care.

Article

Craniofacial microsomia (CFM) is a congenital facial condition that affects the structures derived from the first and second pharyngeal arches (OMIM #164210).1 It is an autosomal dominant condition with an estimated frequency of 1 in 3000–5000. CFM results in underdevelopment of facial structures, most commonly causing abnormal mandibular growth and morphology. Patients are affected to varying degrees with potential involvement of the ear, eye, nerves and soft tissues.2,3

Patients require longitudinal care of a multidisciplinary nature. Treatment is tailored to each individual patient on account of the variation in spectrum of issues related to the severity of each case. Treatment requires close interaction between medical and dental specialities including paediatric dentistry, restorative dentistry, orthodontics and oral and maxillofacial surgery. The general dental practitioner (GDP) plays a role in maintaining adequate oral health, which is a prerequisite for orthodontics and surgical correction, followed by definitive restorative and prosthetic dentistry where required.

Register now to continue reading

Thank you for visiting Orthodontic Update and reading some of our resources. To read more, please register today. You’ll enjoy the following great benefits:

What's included

  • Up to 2 free articles per month
  • New content available